In dictatorships we are more fortunate than you in the West in one respect. We believe nothing of what we read in the newspapers and nothing of what we watch on television, because we know it’s propaganda and lies. Unlike you in the West, we’ve learned to look behind the propaganda and to read between the lines, and unlike you, we know that the real truth is always subversive. — Zdenek Urbanek
10 MAY—The great Indian prince, Siddhartha Gautama, was not a conformist. The man who would become a Buddha—a fully awakened being—saw through the propaganda of his time and rejected it. He saw through the powerful propaganda of his own ego, thereby liberating himself from the deceitful and seductive narratives that had imprisoned him. The Buddha was in every sense a dissident.
We too must become dissidents—if we wish to wake up.
Right now, the unfortunate and tragic situation in Ukraine could be a cause for waking up. We could seize this as an opportunity to see more clearly, to understand and articulate desperately needed truths, and in that way rescue something meaningful from tragedy. Or, we can slip into a deeper slumber.
From the beginning of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24 February the single most important priority and goal for all of us— every single country or individual that professes to care about Ukrainian lives and sovereignty—should have been, and still ought to be, ending the war as quickly as possible through a negotiated settlement.
Why hasn’t this happen yet? Which countries stand in the way? Why, instead of helping to broker a peace, have certain countries (the United States principally among them) decide instead to ship billions of dollars in armaments to keep the war going? Who precisely benefits from this? It is certain the Ukrainian people do not.
To answer these questions is to undertake a process of disillusioning. To pursue these questions—indeed, to even consider them—means breaking through layers of propaganda. And to do that, we need to look outside of mainstream media to independent journalism. We need to think beyond convenient and comforting narratives.
* * *
This crisis was slow in the making and many nations, not least Ukraine itself, played a role in creating it. How many of us are willing to acknowledge that and to consider these matters with any degree of impartiality?
Former Brazilian president Lula da Silva recently made headlines when he insisted that Zelensky “is as responsible as Putin for the war.” It is a sentiment shared by many nations and people. Indeed, most of the world’s nations have refused to join the sanctions or criticize Putin. We in the West would do well to wonder why.
Lula went even further:
The United States has a lot of political clout. And Biden could have avoided war, not incited it. . . . Biden could have taken a plane to Moscow to talk to Putin. This is the kind of attitude you expect from a leader.
Putin shouldn’t have invaded Ukraine. But it’s not just Putin who is guilty. The US and the EU are also guilty.
That which has been apparent to much of the world from the start, is now at last openly acknowledged in the West: the United States is in a proxy war with Russia.
From the beginning of this war the U.S. and its NATO allies have worked to undermined the negotiation process. The U.S. does not want a negotiated settlement because our intent is, and has long been, to use Ukraine to destabilize Russia. The U.S. will willingly see Ukraine destroyed in order to accomplish its ultimate goal of regime change in Moscow. As others have astutely put it: We will fight our proxy war to the last Ukrainian.
Putin is quite correct then, in understanding the situation as an existential threat to Russia and the Russian people. The U.S. and NATO have stupidly and pointlessly and arrogantly and dangerously backed a nuclear-armed nation into a corner. We are willing to risk a nuclear war and the destruction of everything beautiful and sacred in order to undermine Russia. In order to maintain U.S.-led Western hegemony.
And Putin is a madman? If so, he is clearly not the only one.
Why do Americans consent to such madness? Because we are ignorant. Because we are the most propagandized people on the planet and we don’t even know it. Because the lies we are told—the propaganda that is constantly fed to us by our own government and mainstream media—confirm our deepest mythologies. They make us feel and believe we are the innocent good guys—defenders of democracy—we so badly want ourselves to be.
As Glenn Greenwald tweeted yesterday:
Every single US war was justified with the same packaging and rhetoric as the US role in Ukraine: the US is always fighting for benevolent reasons to save innocents from tyranny and aggression. That was the argument for Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, Syria - even Afghanistan.
Let us finally quit pretending that our concern about Ukraine has anything to do with democracy or sovereignty. In 2014, the Obama administration backed a violent rightwing coup in Ukraine, overthrowing a democratically elected president and actually handpicking his replacement. The U.S. has been undermining Ukrainian sovereignty for decades. Long before Trump’s administration began flooding the country with deadly weapons and training neo-Nazi militias.
So why do we keep falling for the same lies, war after pointless war? Because propaganda works best on people who don’t know they’re being propagandized.
All of this stops only when we stop. That is, when we withdraw our consent. It stops when we refuse to be propagandized. It stops when we understand that real truth is always subversive—and when we understand what subversion actually means.
This madness stops when we become the dissidents we are meant to be.
Note: This commentary is not meant to excuse or justify Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. It is meant to place a large measure of responsibility for the provocation, escalation, and continuation of this war where it belongs: with the U.S. and the administration currently occupying the White House. When we see disturbing images of the war in Ukraine, we need to to remember that that is what war looks like, and we need to recall that most of our wars have actually been much worse. Lastly, the new-found enthusiasm in the U.S. for prosecuting war crimes is to be encouraged and should be directed right here at home, where we can prosecute our war criminals. In the meantime, we should free the journalist Julian Assange, who exposed U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. And we should free Daniel Hale who is in prison for exposing numerous and ongoing war crimes associated with our drone warfare program.
Cara, the attached link is a Ukrainian news talk that occurred some weeks prior to the Russian SMO incursion. The show features a politician, Yevgenyi Muraev, who is part of opposition to the western backed govt. Of course, he’s described as basically a pro Russian puppet (Wikipedia, and most western media outlets, although Reuters has a fairly innocuous blurb about him that’s not so transparently biased).
He was a member of the Ukrainian parliament. His party has since been banned by Zelenskyy, his businesses shut down and assets confiscated, and I believe the SBU has declared him traitor. Current whereabouts are said to be Vienna/bratislava/russia. Take your pick.
Regardless, his comments are lucid, and have proven to be quite accurate. You might be interested.
The build up of Russian forces on the border prior to feb24, 2022 has been heavily reported, but the buildup of Ukrainian forces on the border of Donbas has only occasionally been noted, and when so, consistently downplayed. In the vdo link Muraev states this, and no one in the audience or panel members chose to dispute. It was an obvious true statement. This is how the news goes.
As your essay notes, the west is the most heavily propagandized place on earth, USA being home base for info management warfare, and effectively so. What is believable is also controllable. That the USA is the master of public relations and marketing, this is acknowledged; an everyday, all day long capitalist necessity. Americans are quite comfortable with the bombardment. Unavoidably acquiescent since it’s built into the fabric of every single aspect of public endeavor and social intercourse. But of course the USA doesn’t engage in propaganda, heaven forfend! …aka political PR and marketing.
As Lewis Carroll noted in The Hunting of the Snark, “whatever I say three times is true”. So it goes. Belief is an emotional condition, not a rational one. But it’s useful to review words spoken on the record. Such is the link below.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad/90189
The Reuters article about Muraev:
https://www.reuters.com/world/who-is-yevhen-murayev-named-by-britain-kremlins-pick-lead-ukraine-2022-01-23/
Cara, your piece is one of the more reasoned pieces on the Ukraine I've seen. But I still have issues. I put this up on The Chris Hedges Report:
"I hate to be the lone voice in the wilderness but.... I don't agree. You do a pretty good job of delineating some (but by no means all) of the outrages perpetrated by the hegemonic US on the Russian federation but then you offer them no relief. All they're allowed to do is put up with non-stop efforts by "The West" to dismember their country so that they can be violently subjugated. Your interviewee consistently uses the phrase aggressive war in describing Russia's invasion of the Ukraine. I have to call bullshit on that. What, exactly, is aggressive war? I don't believe I've ever heard anyone give a precise description of what that is, so I'll give you what I mean when I say aggressive war. It means starting wars (including economic wars, read sanctions and political wars, read subverting the target government by way of our ubiquitous NGOs) without the benefit of a provocation to you, the country that starts the war. President Putin told the UNSG that Russia's attack on the Ukraine to free the Donbass has a straight line back to NATOs bombing campaign against Serbia which provoked no similar reaction to Russia's invasion of the Ukraine but Serbia didn't have the full weight of the world's finest propaganda operation behind it like the Ukraine does nor was it trained in the uses of propaganda that Stepan Bandaras learned in his time in the German Abwehr in WWII. And before you say it, I agree, not all ethnic Ukrainians are Nazis but all the Nazis in the Ukraine are ethnic Ukrainians. It was the Ukrainians, not the Russians, that trapped some 48 people in the building in Odessa and burnt them all to death. It was also the Ukrainians who haven't investigated or punished any of the perpetrators of that crime. I could rant and rave for quite a while but the real bad boy in today's world is my country, the United States. The United States has fomented coups all over the world, overthrowing governments that we don't like irrespective of how the people of the country in question feel about things (this is not, need I point out, in conformance with the UN charter). We fomented all the trouble in HK through our subversive NGOs the foremost of which would be the CIA cutout, NED, and USAID but there are many more. We waged aggressive war against Nicaragua, arming the losing side to start a civil war. But Daniel Ortega is once again el Presidente of Nicaragua. Bolivia, the US subborned OAS went along with US lies and Evo Morales was chased out of office. The election was eventually declared fair and reasonable but Morales was out of office and the Republican... I mean the right wing crew that took over when Morales left tried to just skip an election but the people forced them to have one which they lost. They then tried to foment another coup to regain power but struck out. Chile got Pinochet and Argentina got their own military coup which they celebrated getting rid of just recently. You guys whined about Ukrainian refugees probably half of which went to Russia and got taken care of but could barely mention the much larger number of refugees created in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Libya and parts of the former Yugoslavia by US aggressive warfare (both bombs and rockets as well as economic and political warfare). The biblical injunction of letting he who is without sin cast the first stone, I believe the US needs to stop messing with everybody on the planet. And we need to implement Zhou Enlai's five principles for peaceful coexistence."
My outrage at Chris' interviewee is the bullshit line that there is no excuse for Russia's invasion of the Donbass. The right of self defense is a concept that is deeply ingrained in many of our structures and principles. Russia has that right and the US has been attacking Russia for decades going back to the Mujaheddin that we created and supported in Afghanistan 40 years ago. Everybody in the US calls it the Russian invasion of Afghanistan but the Russians were invited in. A reality nobody wants to remember. At what point does Russia get to defend itself?